Monday, February 29, 2016
Recently, a nearby community college proposed arming its guards. Let’s suppose it wasn’t just to protect against ISIS, but against the locally grown dangerous and the locally grown insane. One could claim that there is cause, since a few years ago a young individual brought an assault rifle into a neighboring elementary school and killed 20 small children and 6 adults.
While arming the guards may perhaps make the students at the particular college safer, while they are at the college, it does not address the broader problem: How to keep society safe, given the wide availability of weapons capable, from use by someone so motivated, of killing a fair number of people very quickly. But if we make that particular college safe, what of other colleges? If we make the colleges safe, what of other schools? If we make the schools safe what of the plazas, and the stores, and the factories and the hospitals, and the homes? What of the water supplies and power grids?
It is clear that what ever we protect, what ever we do not protect will become the target. And so we must protect it all. The material cost would be stupendous, not just in capitalization, but in maintenance. We cannot pay sufficient guards, so citizens must go armed. And then how to tell, who among the myriad of armed citizens, is not a terrorist, armed and on his way to destruction. Further, even if armed, how can the citizens be protected against suicide bombers. Explosive fireworks, albeit of limited gunpowder content, are available in 26 states. Will potential terrorists find these limitations to be insurmountable?
The fact is, we cannot prevent any terrorist, of either foreign or domestic origin, once sufficiently determined, from inflicting damage on our society or our infrastructure.
What can be done is minimizing the strength and power of the motivations behind the terrorist and his acts.
Two things must be done. The first is to stop inflicting violence. The second is to excite admiration, rather than to incite envy.